1.) Is there other safer Alternatives now Available other than Dental Amalgam?

2.)ls Mercury a product you would want in your mouth as a citizen ?

3. Did it Occur that if something is toxic to the environment and to the touch and air that it would most indefinitely be toxic in the mouth of citizens ?

4. Is this product being advertised properly to third party consumers who cannot adhere to the label that states its a poison ?

5. Does Mercury cause people to develop the symptoms being advertised in this product for the 5 groups of high- risk individuals such as neurological impairment ect. ?

6. Is this product toxic like LEAD due to similarities of the way it affects citizens' health and the environment ?

7. Do the Goverment Representatives value money they save using this product over the health of citizens?

8. Can Government Representatives choose to falsely advertise a product as safe based on their personal feeling which is NOT the law or Constitutional when it's scientifically proven to be toxic to humans and the environment ?

9. Would citizens choose to put this in the mouth of their children or themselves if they could see the label for themselves that has a skull and bones and labeled it as a poison ?

10.) Would you produce a poisonous toxic product to be put in the mouth of third party consumer when you know they will not be able to see the label firsthand all for the sake of revenue ?

11.) Would you agree that mercury is harmful not limited to only certain group of population but everyone who comes in contact with mercury ?

12.) Do High - Risk population stated in the FDA warnings mean people that are AT HIGH RISK TO show signs of mercury poison ?

Is there other safer alternatives now available other than dental amalgam?