Curtis Gorham v. Gary H. Lavine, et al.
Can a medical expert not review matters? Can the hospital not give me informal discovery or cooperate in an investigation and the defense is then claim I didn't have experts review the matters, they didn't investigate is what happened as 766 outlines they are required to. Is the expert I retained evidence of malpractice enough as reasonable investigation under 766.104(1)? Do indigents have to seek experts? Am I being denied access to the court? Has the lower court made errors? Is a conspiracy by medical providers still medical malpractice and can a expert be of any use or only the facts? Did I present enough facts to make a prima facei case? Does the on going harm conspiracy by other providers waive the experts and statutes of limitations? Does covid-19 impact this at all as waiver?
The questions are numerous. Does the hospital risk manager have to cooperate? Did the Florida Department of Health investigation accomplish anything? Should I be apppointed counsel or some evidence hearing based on the allegations before dismissal? Does it all fall under the Florida "Absurd " law or the 120.52 waiver and delegated powers laws? Did the staff do eugenics?
Can a medical expert not review matters?