No. 23-6909

Arnold D. Holland v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-03-06
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure fourth-amendment probable-cause reasonable-suspicion search search-and-seizure supervised-release totality-of-circumstances
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the Fourth Amendment applies to the act of searching or the initial decision to search, based on an objective standard considering the totality of the circumstances of the officers at the moment of the search?

2. Whether an inchoate and unparticularized suspicion or hunch of a supervised release violation communicated from one officer to the searching officer collectively, is enough to satisfy the minimum level of objectivity required to search a supervised releasee's home?

3. Whether reasonable suspicion, under the totality of the circumstances approach once formed, can be negated, vitiated, or dispelled based on a Probation Officer's awareness of intervening circumstances and information that cause the suspicion to be nullified?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourth Amendment applies to the act of searching or the initial decision to search, based on an objective standard considering the totality of the circumstances of the officers at the moment of the search

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2024)

Attorneys

Arnold D. Holland
Arnold D. Holland — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarSolicitor General, Respondent