No. 23-6902
Jeffrey Akard v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-provisions criminal-procedure due-process judicial-review legal-error plea-bargain procedural-due-process retroactivity sentencing statutory-provisions
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
L S/muiJ Q U, S. Cour-L ZTurlge. P/ifnrr.e n
pi PA. Qk^rejeMPsAr appeal Id at j/gr /a Fe. i»jIap.a
4 ^ l$4'Cr £//] ZTo/y ^ A1tLcL&- £t/l error -fo 1/tSr S>paJ-pacJ/)j Sr&f£h//f2ezx\-f'h&.-f' X6ibu>
P
2-. ICs //e Use, of' /}/i (Txh''aL/orJ//)
pfdpPr' iF Cl pl&A djr&&MPA-b fipr>S/zi Ufj/i/prSin±eACj>. paJs or is F^u/>J /ni/JiJ ?k/r// ^Caram Vt46/V) am/pWex nrrp. -4-ke, ex
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Should a U.S. District Court Judge be forced to accept a plea bargain waiver signed in February when the law changed in March?
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-31
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2024)
Attorneys
Jeffrey Akard
Jeffrey Akard — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent