Does a sentence twice that authorized by the jury's verdict constitute plain error? This Court's decision in Rosales-Mireles suggests so, but recent Fifth Circuit caselaw holds otherwise.

In a criminal case, must the Presentence Report required by Federal Rule of Procedure 32 contain an explanation of the basis of the defendant's sentencing guidelines calculation? Does the answer to that question change if the basis for the calculation is consistent with the trial record?

Does a sentence twice that authorized by the jury's verdict constitute plain error?