No. 23-6895
Bradley Lane Croft v. United States
Tags: criminal-law fraud identity-theft qualifications statutory-interpretation united-states-v-dubin
Latest Conference:
2024-03-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether aggravated identity theft convictions must be reversed when the real "crux" of the fraud turns, not on any person's name, but on their qualifications. See United States v. Dubin, 599 U.S. 110 (2023).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether aggravated identity theft convictions must be reversed when the real 'crux' of the fraud turns, not on any person's name, but on their qualifications
Docket Entries
2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 4, 2024)
Attorneys
Bradley Croft
James Scott Sullivan — Law Offices of J. Scott Sullivan, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent