No. 23-6876
Joseph Neil Bronson, Jr. v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-law criminal-attempt criminal-procedure due-process first-amendment free-speech legislative-intent overbroad post-conviction-relief standing statutory-interpretation vagueness
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-03-22
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is 18 U.S.C. § 1504(1)(C) (Omnibus Crime Control Act) applied to Bronson's Metaphysical attempt to attempt "Louefl)rco,c|j uayi w" unconstitutionally?
Should Bronson's conviction be vacated under his § 2255 post-conviction rescue differentiable because it Vagueness attach; has debatable issues. Or have been
III. SUM 6 I liaot Wfl entitled to a lesser-included or transferred Scheme, as the case rofiSon Ao foundation of his guilty plea where mfentio i\ Od&S
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is IP U.S.C. §1994 unconstitutionally vague or overbroad as applied in Bronson's Metaphysical attempt?
Docket Entries
2024-03-25
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2024-03-05
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-02
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2024)
Attorneys
Joseph Neil Bronson
Joseph Neil Bronson Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent