No. 23-6867
Nelson L. Bruce v. Bank of America, N.A.
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: consumer-dispute consumer-disputes credit-reporting-agencies credit-reporting-agency data-furnishers fair-credit-reporting-act frivolous-claims good-cause rule-60-motion statute-of-limitations
Latest Conference:
2024-06-20
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether each dispute sent to a Credit reporting agency or a data furnisher by a consumer that has not been determined to be frivolous or irrelevant starts a new statute of limitation under the FCRA?
2. Whether there is good cause to wait until claims that are before another court/tribunal is dismissed without prejudice to file the same claims in another court proceeding?
3. Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 60(c) prescribes a 1 year statute to file a Rule 60(b)(l)(2)(3) motion?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether each dispute sent to a Credit reporting agency or a data furnisher by a consumer that has not been determined to be frivolous or irrelevant starts a new statute of limitation under the FCRA
Docket Entries
2024-06-24
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-06-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2024.
2024-05-23
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent Bank of America, N.A. to respond filed.
2024-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2024)
2023-11-16
Application (23A433) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 28, 2024.
2023-11-13
Application (23A433) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 29, 2023 to January 28, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
Bank of America, N.A.
Thomas Richmond McPherson III — McGuireWoods, Respondent
Nelson L. Bruce
Nelson L. Bruce — Petitioner