No. 23-6864
Relisted (2)IFP
Tags: brady-violation civil-procedure constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance parole-revocation probation-revocation prosecutorial-misconduct standing
Latest Conference:
2024-05-30
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Due Process Clause requires a hearing before revoking probation
Docket Entries
2024-06-03
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner DENIED.
2024-05-14
Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/30/2024.
2024-04-10
Motion for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by petitioner.
2024-03-25
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-03-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2024.
2022-10-07
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
Solomon Roberts
Solomon Roberts — Petitioner