No. 23-6859
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: constitutional-amendment constitutional-law criminal-procedure district-court-procedure due-process evidence federal-courts federal-law habeas-corpus witness-identification
Latest Conference:
2024-04-26
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the Courts below determination that the witnesses Identification was not
unduly suggestive, was contrary to clearly established Federal I,aw §28 USC 2254[d][l][2]
U.S. Const. Amend. 14
2. Whether the District Court committed error by ruling on petitioner's State appeal,
Instead of the issues and arguments raised in petitioner's Habeas petition
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Courts below determination that the witnesses Identification was not unduly suggestive, was contrary to clearly established Federal Taw §28 usc 2254[d][1][2] U.S. Const. Amend. 14
Docket Entries
2024-04-29
Petition DENIED.
2024-04-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/26/2024.
2024-04-04
Waiver of right of respondent Jamie LaManna to respond filed.
2024-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 1, 2024)
2024-01-22
Application (23A673) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until March 18, 2024.
2024-01-11
Application (23A673) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 18, 2024 to March 18, 2024, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.
Attorneys
Andrew Smart
Andrew Smart — Petitioner
Jamie LaManna
Leonard Joblove — Kings County District Attorney's Office, Respondent