(A) Did the Eleventh Circuit Court have legal jurisdiction to hear and rule on my case since this case did not originate in Florida? {Established by Congress in 1981, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Judicial Circuit has jurisdiction over cases originating in the states of Alabama, Honda and Georgia. The circuit includes nine district courts with each state divided into Northern, Middle and Southern Districts} (https://www.ca11.uscourts.aov/about-court).

(B) Currently, should my case be heard by the Florida Supreme Court since I am how a citizen of Florida?

(C) If people can't speak English, do they meet all requirements to be disabled?

(D) Why didn't the Circuit Court Clerks allow for the Judges to review the appeal for a Rehearing?

(E) Are the federal laws, rules and requirements for disability including ADA, recognized and adhered to in the US and the State of Florida?

(F) Are the AU's and Courts allowed to intentionally misrepresent, misquote and misapply laws?

(G) Are the AU's and courts allowed to intentionally disregard/omit relevant and pertinent evidence submitted by the appellant?

(H) Why aren't the lower Courts lawfully and correctly applying the federal disability laws/rules stated above (# 4) to the case for the appellant?

(I) Are the appellees intentionally legally allowed to alter a Judge's decision?

(J) Are the Appellant's treating medical professionals considered Medical Experts?

(K) Can the US Supreme Court apply the federal laws and rules for disabled persons and for person under the ADA (Americans With Disability Act of 2008, As Amended) in accordance to, and as they are federally described and amended?

(L) Will the US Supreme Court overturn any prior rulings regarding this case, should they find, in accordance to federal disability laws for persons with combined disabilities, the appellant should be legally and rightfully granted/entitled to have received her social security disability benefits retro May 20, 2015 through December 31, 2020?

(M) Is it required by law for the AU and the lower courts to disclose their claims of proof of "preponderance evidence" as opposed to it just being stated within their written decisions?

Did the Eleventh Circuit Court have legal jurisdiction to hear and rule on this case?