No. 23-6843
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: due-process expert-witness fair-trial fourteenth-amendment ineffective-assistance post-conviction sixth-amendment trial-procedure
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Does a trial court's "tender and accept" procedure of an expert witness in front of a jury violative of a Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial and Fourteenth Amendment right to Due Process of law.
2. Did the Fifth District Court of Appeals err when it per curiam affirmed the trial court's post-conviction ruling that trial counsel was not ineffective in failing to object to the "tender and accept procedure of an expert witness or that counsel was not ineffective in failing to file a motion for mistrial
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does a trial court's 'tender and accept' procedure of an expert witness in front of a jury violative of a Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a fair trial and Fourteenth Amendment right to Due Process of law?
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-20
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2024-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 29, 2024)
Attorneys
Florida
Rebecca Rock McGuigan — Office of Florida Attorney General , Respondent
Joseph A. Crenshaw
Joseph A. Crenshaw II — Petitioner