No. 23-6839
IFP
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure discretionary-strategy effective-counsel expert-testimony false-confessions ineffective-assistance police-interrogation sixth-amendment strickland strickland-standard
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Did the Nevada Supreme Court deprive petitioner of his Sixth Amendment right to effective counsel by analyzing counsel's ineffective performance as mere discretionary strategy?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
did-the-nevada-supreme-court-deprive-petitioner-of-his-sixth-amendment-right-to-effective-counsel
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-25
Reply of petitioner Donte Johnson filed.
2024-03-15
Brief of respondent Nevada in opposition filed.
2024-02-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 28, 2024)
2023-12-19
Application (23A564) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 23, 2024.
2023-12-14
Application (23A564) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 25, 2023 to February 23, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.
Attorneys
Donte Johnson
The State of Nevada