1) WAS THE LOWER COURTS WRONG FOR NOT EXCEPTING THE ATTACHMENTS THAT WAS
ATTACHED TO THE ORIGINAL HABEAS CORPUS PETITION TO STATE CLAIMS IN MORE
DETAIL?

2) DID THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRESION WHEN THEY DENIED PETITIONER'S
REQUEST FOR A RHINE V. WEBER STAY WHEN DIXON V. BAKER CHANGE THE LAW WHEN
POST CONVICTED WITH OUT COINSELOR?

3) WAS THE DISTRICT COURT WRONG FOR RECHARACTERIZING PETITIONER'S 60(b)(6)
MOTION TO BE A 60>!b)(l) MOTION TO FIT THE CRITERIA FOR ,lyr. TIME RESTRICTIONS
FOR DENIAL?

4) DID THE DISTRICT COURT ABUSE ITS DISCRESION BY IGNORING THE PRESENTS
SET BY DIXON V. BAKER (9th GIR. 2017.) WHEN LAWS CHANGE TO OBTAIN
A RHINES STAY?

5) DID THE DISTRICT COURT IGNORE PRESENTS WHEN SET IN THE U.S. SUPREME
COURT, IN SLACK V. MCDANIELS RULING ON SECOND OR SUCESSIVE PETITIONS
WHEN THE PETITION WAS DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE?

Question not identified