No. 23-6824
Jeremiah James Lynch v. United States
Response WaivedRelisted (2)IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-law criminal-procedure cruel-and-unusual-punishment due-process eighth-amendment parole proportionality sentencing sentencing-guidelines supervised-release
Latest Conference:
2024-06-06
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Is it a Constitutional Violation to a grade A, naoUTk>iT\
f^ccx lOO? w*W T^^rmorc.
/AovavT, ^cawsq A w^e, T,\m<l \a\£> oc\AW a\■6<^ v0^ c^- ('^
YAoa'tWb \v\ p\"\5oii\ a/A^. ov\ o^cfovvA ^€Ttc3v oV T<^zS\h^ea ^k(\^
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the petitioner's constitutional rights were violated by the application of a 'grade A' violation for a local crime, which resulted in the petitioner receiving more than his original sentence, including an additional period of supervised release
Docket Entries
2024-06-10
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-05-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
2024-04-26
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-08
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 27, 2024)
Attorneys
Jeremiah Lynch
Jeremiah Lynch — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent