No. 23-6812

Niki Hamidi v. Ike M. Iqbal

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2024-02-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: collusion duty estate estate-protection executor-duty fraud fraud-prevention paternity-claim probate-court settlement settlement-challenge
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the probate court has a duty to protect an estate against fraud?

Whether the probate court has a duty to deny a settlement against an estate for a fraudulent paternity claim when there is sufficient evidence that the claim is fraudulent and meritless?

Whether the probate court has a duty to deny a settlement against an estate when there is sufficient evidence of collusion between the executor and participant?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the probate court has a duty to protect an estate against fraud?

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-02-29
Waiver of right of respondent Ike M. Iqbal to respond filed.
2024-02-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 25, 2024)

Attorneys

Ike M. Iqbal
James C. ButteryAndre, Morris & Buttery, a Prof. Law Corporation, Respondent
Niki Hamidi
Niki Hamidi — Petitioner