No. 23-6791
IFP
Tags: capital-punishment death-penalty due-process eighth-amendment evolving-standards judicial-sentencing post-conviction state-court
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether it comports with due process for a state court to reject as untimely an evolving-standards claim on a theory that would never allow for such a claim to be reviewed in a successive posture.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether it comports with due process for a state court to reject as untimely an evolving-standards claim on a theory that would never allow for such a claim to be reviewed in a successive posture
Docket Entries
2024-02-28
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-28
Application (23A761) referred to the Court.
2024-02-28
Application (23A761) for stay of execution of sentence of death presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is denied. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
2024-02-27
Reply of petitioner Thomas E. Creech filed.
2024-02-26
Brief of respondent Idaho in opposition filed.
2024-02-21
Application (23A761) for a stay of execution of sentence of death, submitted to Justice Kagan.
2024-02-21
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.
Attorneys
State of Idaho
L. LaMont Anderson — Idaho Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Thomas E. Creech
Jonah Joshua Horwitz — Federal Defender Services of ldaho, Petitioner