No. 23-679

Gene Rechtzigel v. Green Valley Development, LLP, et al.

Lower Court: Minnesota
Docketed: 2023-12-22
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: boundary-determination constitutional-rights due-process full-and-fair-trial judicial-procedure land-boundary property-rights statutory-interpretation statutory-rights
Key Terms:
DueProcess Securities
Latest Conference: 2024-02-23
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Did the State Courts of Minnesota deprive Petitioner of Liberty, Due Process of Law, United States Constitutional Rights, Minnesota Constitutional Rights, and Statutory Rights to Determine Boundaries and Title to certain Land?

II. Did the State Courts of Minnesota deprive Petitioner from ever having a Full and Fair Trial by Jury under Minn. Statutes 559.23-25 and Minn. Statutes 541.02, while the action is ripe, by having the complaint hereby Dismissed with Prejudice?

III. Did the State Courts of Minnesota deprive Petitioner of property by rejecting the 60 years old (North-South) possession/usage/fence line as shown to be the true boundary line, on the face of the earth, according to the ArcGIS Web Map, as compiled by the Federal Bureau of Land Management?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Did the state courts deprive the petitioner of due-process, property-rights, constitutional-rights, statutory-rights, full-and-fair-trial, boundary-determination

Docket Entries

2024-02-26
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/23/2024.
2023-12-18

Attorneys

Gene Rechtzigel
Gene Rechtzigel — Petitioner