No. 23-6789
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: evidence grand-jury grand-jury-testimony impeachment impeachment-evidence jury-instructions prior-inconsistent-statement substantive-evidence witness witness-testimony
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2024-03-28
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Can a party knowingly call a witness it expects to testify contrary to previous statements in order for those statements to entered as substantive evidence before a jury?
2. Is giving the standard 2.13 Prior Inconsistent Statement as Impeachment instructions confusing, contradictory or misleading when prior grand jury testimony was used for impeachment and is also entered as substantive evidence?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can a party knowingly call a witness it expects to testify contrary to previous statements in order for those statements to entered as substantive evidence before a jury?
Docket Entries
2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-06
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2024-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2024)
Attorneys
Florida
Randolph Maya
Randolph Maya — Petitioner