No. 23-6784

Khaled Elbeblawy v. United States

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-20
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: aedpa circuit-split constitutional-rights equitable-tolling habeas-corpus rigid-approach statute-of-limitations totality-of-circumstances
Key Terms:
ERISA HabeasCorpus Punishment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2024-03-28
Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION 1: Equitable Tolling: Whether the Holland Court's direction to review with flexibility the circumstances warranting equitable tolling is consistently applied where the Circuits are split into two disparate approaches: some using a flexible totality of the circumstances approach and others a rigid circumstance-by-circumstance approach, where each circumstance is viewed in isolation.

QUESTION 2: Structural Error: Whether a Petitioner is entitled to habeas review for raising an issue of Constitutional magnitude when the issue raised is one of structural error based on the petitioner being deprived of his 6th Amendment guarantee of meaningful adversarial confrontation and denial of assistance of counsel.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Equitable Tolling under AEDPA

Docket Entries

2024-04-01
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-13
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
2024-03-07
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2023-12-07
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 21, 2024)

Attorneys

Khaled Elbeflawy
Rebecca Ann SmithBHT Legal, PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Respondent