No. 23-6778

In Re Reidie James Jackson

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-02-16
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: breach-of-contract contract-breach court-of-appeals district-court expedited-relief expedited-review habeas-corpus judicial-review procedural-delay release-pending
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

than the district. £Lfiurtr or Court: o-P Appeals- refuse to rate
Pettit)oner£ rt&faffh&for expedi ted re/ieuJ and fur 'relza<^ pend/ncj cidp
LidlicatiDn in cl habeas. Corpus proceeding In a case-that has been
pmdincj *Lloo -plus years ^ despite that there has been cl breach
i9t Cohtracir establ)§he_d On. the, record^on

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can the district court or Court of Appeals refuse to rule on Petitioner's motions for expedited review and for release pending adjudication in a habeas corpus proceeding in a case that has been pending three-plus years, despite there being a breach of contract established on the record?

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2023-12-21
Petition for a writ of mandamus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2024)

Attorneys

Reidie Jackson
Reidie James Jackson — Petitioner