No. 23-6775
Jesse Dean Redfearn v. William "Chris" Rankins, Warden
IFP
Tags: constitutional-law due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus sixth-amendment
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. "Did the United States District Court and Court of Appeals properly apply clearly established constitutional law, [Hemphill v. New York, 142 S.Ct. 681, 689 (2022)], when adjudicating my Habeas Petition? "
2. "When the United States District Court and Court of Appeals violate the Fifth, Sixth, Ninth or Fourteenth Amendments) by failing to properly apply clearly established constitutional law, [Hemphill v. New York, 142 S.Ct. 681, 689 (2022)], when adjudicating my Habeas Petition? "
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the United States District Court and Court of Appeals properly apply clearly established constitutional law, [Hemphill v. New York, 142 S.Ct. 681, 689 (2022)]
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2023-05-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 18, 2024)
Attorneys
Jesse Dean Redfearn
Jesse Dean Redfearn — Petitioner