Did the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit fail to consider the effect the combination of the relevant attributes of Mr. Hannold's diagnoses of Impulse Control Disorder, Conduct Disorder, and Antisocial Personality Disorder along with the absence of Mr. Hannold's acting "custodian", his father and the egregious breach of duty from Attorney Lopresti had on Mr. Hannold's ability to file a timely 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition which culminated in an unreasonable application of the equitable tolling doctrine thereby denying Due Process of Law as a matter of first impression?

Did the U.S. Court of Appeals of the Third Circuit fail to consider the effect the combination of the relevant attributes of Mr. Hannold's diagnoses of Impulse-Control-Disorder, Conduct-Disorder, and Antisocial-Personality-Disorder along with the absence of Mr. Hannold's acting 'custodian