In any trial in which a guilty verdict can result in a criminal conviction; is it lawful to have compulsory pro sc representation by the defendant?

If a defendant is unaware of the scope, duties, and procedural obligations of pro sc representation, does this in any way hender or inlringc upon their right to a fair trial?

Ifa defendant has been diagnosed with a neurological or psychological condition that is associated with mental debilitation, is it unconstitutional to have that person represent themself without having their condition and its potential impact on the trail assessed?

In a trial in w hich the defendant is represented pro sc: docs proceeding with a trial in the absence of components such as stenography . evidence and witnesses align w ith the United Slates Constitution's as it relates to the VI amendment ?

In a Pro sc trial in w hich a "stay of judgment" has been issued to allow for a court ordered menial health or substance abuse evaluation to he conducted immediately following the trial due to a judge 's skepticism in the legitimacy of a defendant 's ncurodivergenee or cognitive deficit, in any wav infringe upon that defendants Constitutional rights to a fair and impartial trial. Moreover, arc the results of those findings sufficient for establishing a conviction or dismissal?

Is it lawful to deny a defendant the opportunity to furnish proof of compliance with a court order?

Is it lawful for a court order to he rescinded on the grounds of a violation of probation or contempt of court regarding such an order without due process related to the alleged violations?

Is it lawful for the prosecution in a pro se case to inform the opposing counsel that the reception and review of video evidence ol the alleged crime is contingent upon the defendant 's decision to waive their constitutional right to a trial by jury?

Is it lawful for a defendant in a pro se trial to assume (he role of counsel if they have expressed doubt in their ability to clfectivcly represent themselves ?

In a judicial svstem which supports the Constitution of the United Slates; what assurance do defendants in trials of compulsory pro sc have that their rights wall he upheld and not infringed upon?

As it relates to the United Slates of America; In a judicial system that supports fair and equal protection under its constitution.w hat provisions exist to ensure all defendants regardless of their lelic aptitude .competency or literacy receive a fair trial w hen pro sc representation is compulsory in their defense?

In a trial or ease in which a defendant is represented pro se and multiple orders have been declared, rescinded, redacted, altered or otherwise modified in anv wav; is it lawful not to inform or make aware to the defendant who is presently acting in a counsel capacity; of their legal and procedural duties .responsibilities and potential courses of action associated with both the role and its objective of maintaining an effective assistance of counsel?

Is compulsory pro se representation lawful in criminal trials?