1. Whether jurisdiction-conferring transactions between related business entities are subject to a presumption of collusion in violation of 28 U.S.C. § 1359.

2. Whether a bankruptcy court has "related to" jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1334(b) to enjoin claims against a non-debtor with no actual economic effect on estate assets or their distribution to creditors.

3. Whether 11 U.S.C. § 105(a) permits bankruptcy courts to issue equitable relief not expressly authorized in the Bankruptcy Code or, at a minimum, whether the Court should hold this petition for Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., No. 23-124, and then grant, vacate, and remand if the Court reaches this question there.

Whether transactions between related business entities are subject to a presumption of collusion in violation of 28-U.S.C-1359