No. 23-6745

Raymond Wilson, III v. Fairhaven Police Department, et al.

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2024-02-14
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-prosecution due-process equal-protection interstate-crime jurisdictional-issues legal-elements malicious-prosecution prosecutorial-discretion standing statutory-interpretation summary-judgment
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)

Why some cases can be successful and prosecute, whereas others cannot, having the same elements yet to be interpreted, and whereas a bias of a certain decision will side in one way, no part supposed to synchronize in the matter, whereas the non-movants would set every possible opportunity for proceedings where elements can be acted to, with the clear against standard act, whereas the instant case, no possible cause and make except present yet the therefore different forms with that can easily be received. The at this panel of judges, for jurisdiction of the court in as a statute, for different reasons. The problem as suffice to a look, the summary so further both cases. Coupled and without proper miscarriage on the facts to make a case to find data vs. summary, crude me and case they can cut and dodges and, allowed with crunch with other. Yet point to a rays either the warning when other the typed. There are three groups or defendant's C.J. chains, Southern and protection. This peace equal unity jumps with other someone, which you cannot to this. In my relative of my case F.P. is needed as much as I submitted was overlooked, which provides.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner can be successfully prosecuted for malicious prosecution when the elements are interpreted differently by different courts

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Petition DENIED.
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-02-22
Waiver of right of respondent Town of Fairhaven, et al to respond filed.
2024-02-09
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 15, 2024)

Attorneys

Raymond Wilson
Raymond Wilson III — Petitioner
Town of Fairhaven, et al
Gareth W NotisMorrison Mahoney LLP, Respondent