No. 23-673

In Re Jeffrey Lance Hill, Sr.

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2023-12-21
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 5th-amendment civil-procedure federal-jurisdiction fifth-amendment property-rights res-judicata rooker-feldman rooker-feldman-doctrine standing takings takings-clause
Latest Conference: 2024-04-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)

1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit erred by dismissing Appeal No. 23-12231-D on August 23, 2023, with Appellant's Motion for Extension of Time pending; disregarding Local Rule 42-1(b) and effecting a violation of the Due Process Clause and the Rule of Law; and

2. Whether state court judges possess judicial immunity to take real property without just compensation when the taking began directly through a state agency permitting process effecting a violation of the Takings Clause of the U.S. Constitution; and

3. Whether the elements of res judicata exist in this case to justify dismissal in the trial court.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine bars a federal court from considering a takings claim under the Fifth Amendment when the state court proceedings did not actually decide the federal takings issue

Docket Entries

2024-04-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2024-03-20
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-03-13
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-23
Waiver of right of respondent Suwannnee River Water Management District to respond filed.
2023-12-16
Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due January 22, 2024)

Attorneys

Jeffrey L. Hill
Jeffrey Lance Hill Sr. — Petitioner
Suwannnee River Water Management District
Chase HattawayRumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A., Respondent