Whether the Eleventh Circuit imposed an erroneously high standard when it denied a COA to address any or all of the above claims and, if so, whether the Court should docket the case for briefing and argument, or summarily reverse?

Whether the Court should hold this case pending the Eleventh Circuit's ruling in Williams v. Warden, GDCP, No. 22-10249 (11th Cir.), a capital habeas case addressing some of the same procedural issues presented here, which has been briefed and argued, and awaits adjudication. Mr. Heidler had asked the Eleventh Circuit on rehearing to hold the case pending its decision in Williams, but the Eleventh Circuit instead denied rehearing.

Whether the Eleventh Circuit imposed an erroneously high standard when it denied a COA to address the petitioner's claims