No. 23-6707
Sean Robert Wathen v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: criminal-procedure dangerous-weapon district-court drug-offense enhancement factual-findings findings-of-fact sentencing sentencing-discretion sentencing-guidelines u.s.s.g-2d1.1(b)(1) weapon-enhancement
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is the sentencing court required to make specific findings of fact, supported by the record, that a defendant possessed a dangerous weapon in connection with the offense of conviction, before applying a two-level enhancement under U.S.S. G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), and did the district court do so in this case?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is the sentencing court required to make specific findings of fact, supported by the record, that a defendant possessed a dangerous weapon in connection with the offense of conviction, before applying a two-level enhancement under U.S.S. G. § 2D1.1(b)(1), and did the district court do so in this case?
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-02-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 11, 2024)
Attorneys
Sean Robert Wathen
Katherine Ball — Katie Ball PLLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent