1. Should certiorari be granted if the 4th USCA judgment conflicts with USSC on whether state Statute Of Limitations (SOL) bars Fed agency adverse punitive treatment for unprosecuted, non-capital violations of state law claimed by Fed agency?

2. Should certiorari be granted if the 4th USCA judgment conflicts with USSC on whether Fed Consent Decree and Fed Settlement makes related state penal cord unreliable?

3. Should certiorari be granted if the 4th USCA judgment conflicts with USSC on the proper interpretation of penal statutes?

4. Should certiorari be granted if the 4th USCA judgment conflicts with USSC on whether Fed agency can legally exceed its Congress-given power?

5. Should certiorari be granted if the 4th USCA judgment conflicts with USSC on the Const'al right to present evidence at a Fed agency hearing?

6. Should certiorari be granted if the 4th USCA judgment conflicts with USSC's bar on materially false data being used by Fed agency at administrative hearing?

7. Should certiorari be granted if the 4th USCA judgment conflicts with USSC on the Full Faith and Credit Act, the Rules Of Decision Act and Government Records Act?

8. Should certiorari be granted if the 4th USCA judgment conflicts with the USSC on FRE Rule 901(a) correlated with FRCP Rule 44(a)(1)(A)(B)(i)(ii)?

9. Should certiorari be granted if the 4th USCA judgment conflicts with USSC on FRE Rule 201 as well as FRCP Rules 12(b); 12(f); and 56(c)?

Should certiorari be granted if the 4th USCA judgment conflicts with the USSG on whether state Statute Of Limitations (SOL) bars Fed agency adverse or punitive treatment for unprosecuted, noncapital violations of state law claimed by Fed agency?