1. Does public policy strongly favor settlement of disputes without litigation; or do Courts have discretion to not enforce settlement agreements?

2. Is the purpose of rescission to restore both parties to their former position as far as possible' and 'to bring about substantial justice by adjusting the equities between the parties; or may one party keep the consideration it received under the rescinded agreement?

3. Is it an abuse of discretion for a court to not enter a default judgment against a party who has made an appearance; filed no response; and has neither a meritorious defense nor excusable neglect, nonetheless?

4. Does the present case, present a defense for the non-payment of wages?

5. Does a court have discretion to deny Petitioner his Statutory Right to Attorney Fees?

6. Does Arizona jurisprudence favor summary judgment?

7. Do the Appellate Courts have discretion to hear a Petition for Special Review in an interlocutory decision?

Does public policy strongly favor settlement of disputes without litigation or do courts have discretion to not enforce settlement agreements?