Mark Marvin v. United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
FirstAmendment HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
WHETHER PETITIONER HAS STANDING TO FILE A HABEAS AND MANDAMUS PETITION WITH THE COURT OF APPEALS WHEN THE QUESTION OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH AFFECTS HIM AS A MATTER OF LAW?
II. WHETHER, FOLLOWING MILLER'S ARREST AT A PROTEST AT THE U.S. CAPITOL, THE COURT SHOULD HAVE CHARGED THE JURY WITH THE ELEMENTS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE U.S. CONSTITUTION, AND WHETHER THE FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS APPLY TO A PROTEST AT THE CAPITOL?
III. WHETHER COUNSEL WAS CONSTITUTIONALLY INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO RAISE A FIRST AMENDMENT DEFENSE FOR DEFENDANT WHO WAS ARRESTED FOR CRIMINAL VIOLATION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT?
Whether petitioner has standing to file a habeas and mandamus petition