No. 23-6649
Larry David Davis v. Barry Sims, Judge, 7th Division, Pulaski County Circuit Court, et al.
IFP
Tags: 4th-amendment adverse-action civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process fingerprinting investigative-procedures law-enforcement legal-standing probable-cause search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-04-12
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the police violated the Fourth Amendment by fingerprinting the petitioner without probable cause or a warrant
Docket Entries
2024-04-15
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. As the petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court's process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from petitioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).
2024-03-21
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
2024-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2024)
Attorneys
Larry D. Davis
Larry David Davis — Petitioner