No. 23-6644
Matthew Lane Durham v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence constitutional-claim constitutional-rights due-process federal-prisoner habeas-corpus newly-discovered-evidence post-conviction-relief trial-review
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
In Herrera v. Collins, 506 U.S. 390 (1993), this Court held that there is no free-standing claim of actual innocence under the Constitution available to a state prisoner seeking habeas relief in a federal court.
The question presented is whether this is also true for a federal prisoner seeking a new trial based on actual innocence in the same federal court that convicted him?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal prisoner can bring a free-standing claim of actual innocence to seek a new trial
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due March 4, 2024)
Attorneys
Matthew Durham
James L. Hankins — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent