1. Whether Lower Court Misapplied Cert. Denial On 10/5/15 Was A Judicial decision Rendered Erroneous By Subsequent Legal Or Factual Changes Also Qualifies As A Mistake Under Rule 60(b)(1) And Extraordinary Circumstances Under Rule 60(b)(6) When Cert. Denial On Direct Appeal Had Not Been Sent By Disposition Under Supreme Court Rule 16.

2. Whether Lower Court Erred In Affirming District Court Decision On Time-Barred* Was Correct In Its Procedural Ruling On Rule 59(e) And Rule;60(b) (1) Also Rule 60(b)(6) As Second or Successive Without Petitioner First Allowed To Withdraw or Recharacterize His Petition Under Castro v. United States.

Whether Lower Court Misapplied Cert. Denial On 10/5/15 Was A Judicial decision Rendered Erroneous By Subsequent Legal Or Factual Changes Also Qualifies As A Mistake Under Rule 60(b)(1) And Extraordinary Circumstances Under Rule 60(b)(6) When Cert. Denial On Direct Appeal Had Not Been Sent By DisPosition Under Supreme Court Rule 16