DOES THE LAW AS ENACTED BY THE 1974, LEGISLATURE IN CHAPTER 74-121 APPEAR IN THE 1974 SUPPLEMENT TO FLORIDA STATES 1973?

Does Statute 794.011(2) existvalid law? When it appears that from its creation S.B. 74-121 on May 31," 1974. The replacement bill never again appears m another session in the 1974 journals for it to be made an authentic law laid outas a by the legislature in the journals.

Was statute 794.011(2) ever sent back to the legislature by any record recordings in the journal records of revisors bills op votes passing the bill passing the bill or records showing any of the mandatory constitutional requirements that the legislature handled or performed that would give the bill it's authenticated promulgated validity. The legislative act when made should and be a written expression of the legislative will. In evidenceor votes appear not only of the passage but of the authority of the law making power, is nearly or quite a self evident proposition. On the face of such authority, in order that it should clearly appear, upon simple inspection of the written law and journal records of the legislature.

DOES THE SB 74-121 THE CREATION OF STATUTE LEAVES THE COURTS IN WANT OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION? THE ISSUE IS NOT WHETHER THE LAWS CHARGED AGAINST YOU OR LAWS LIKE THEM WERE794.011(2) PASSED BY THE LEGISLATURE (OR CONGRESS) BUT THEY DON 'T EXIST IN THEIR CURRENT STATE AS VALID LAWS. THE LINE WHICH SEPARATES ERROR IN JUDGEMENT FROM THE USURPATION OF POWER IS VERY DEFINITE. SINCE HERE THE LAWS THAT ARE IN USE TODAY ARE INVALID ON THEIR FACE. IT DEPRIVES THE COURT 'S OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION.

Does the creation of Statute 794.011(2) leave the courts without subject-matter-jurisdiction?