No. 23-661
Tug Hill Operating, LLC v. Lastephen Rogers
Tags: arbitrability arbitration-agreement arbitration-agreements circuit-split contract-interpretation delegation-doctrine delegation-of-arbitrability gateway-questions nonsignatories nonsignatory third-party-beneficiary
Key Terms:
Arbitration WageAndHour Privacy
Arbitration WageAndHour Privacy
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
When an arbitration agreement delegates gateway questions of arbitrability to the arbitrator, may a court still interpret the agreement for itself to decide whether the agreement covers nonsignatories?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a court may interpret a nonsignatory's contractual rights despite a delegation of questions of arbitrability to the arbitrator
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-08
Supplemental brief of petitioner Tug Hill Operating, LLC filed. (Distributed)
2024-01-24
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-18
Waiver of right of respondent Lastephen Rogers to respond filed.
2024-01-18
Brief amicus curiae of American Exploration and Production Council filed.
2024-01-17
Application (23A567) denied by The Chief Justice.
2024-01-08
Reply of applicant Tug Hill Operating, LLC filed.
2024-01-03
Response to application from respondent Lastephen Rogers filed.
2023-12-20
Response to application (23A567) requested by The Chief Justice, due by 4 p.m. (EST), January 3, 2024.
2023-12-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 18, 2024)
2023-12-15
Application (23A567) for a stay, submitted to The Chief Justice.
2023-10-27
Application (23A379) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until January 4, 2024.
2023-10-24
Application (23A379) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 5, 2023 to January 4, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.
Attorneys
American Exploration and Production Council
Steven Paul Lehotsky — Lehotsky Keller Cohn LLP, Amicus
Lastephen Rogers
Anthony Joseph Majestro — Powell & Majestro, Respondent
Tug Hill Operating, LLC
John Caviness O'Quinn — Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Petitioner