1. The lower court endorsed the Government's
supplementation of the "record" with new documents
mid-appeal. Does the lower Court's decision, which
demonstrates a misapplication of the canons of
statutory construction—directly affecting Petitioner's
Due Process rights—and highlights a difference in
federal appellate practice regarding the addition of
new materials to the "record" on appeal, necessitate
this Court's intervention?

2. Can a federal prosecutor of child sex crimes
cases also serve as a military judge in a child sex crime
case without an appearance of partiality?

Does the lower court's decision to allow the government to supplement the record mid-appeal demonstrate a misapplication of statutory canons and affect the petitioner's due process rights?