No. 23-6576
Caitlyn Williams and Tamarae Larue v. Missouri
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights compulsory-education constitutional-interpretation constitutional-law due-process legal-vagueness school-attendance statutory-construction vagueness
Latest Conference:
2024-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the language "on a regular basis" in the compulsory school attendance law is impermissibly vague in violation of due process guarantees.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the language 'on a regular basis' in the compulsory school attendance law is impermissibly vague in violation of due process guarantees
Docket Entries
2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-13
Waiver of right of respondent Missouri to respond filed.
2024-01-18
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 26, 2024)
2023-10-13
Application (23A325) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until January 24, 2024.
2023-10-04
Application (23A325) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 25, 2023 to January 24, 2024, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.
Attorneys
Caitlyn Williams, et al.
Ellen H. Flottman — Off. of State Public Defender, Petitioner
Missouri
Shaun J. Mackelprang — Missouri Attorney General's Office, Respondent