1. Whether clearly established federal law as determined by this Court forbids
the prosecution's use of a woman's plainly irrelevant sexual history, gender
presentation, and role as a mother and wife to assess guilt and punishment.

2. Whether this Court should summarily reverse in light of cumulative effect
of the errors in this case at guilt and sentencing, including the introduction
of a custodial statement made without the warnings Miranda v. Arizona,
384 U.S. 436 (1966) requires.

Whether clearly established federal law as determined by this Court forbids the prosecution's use of a woman's plainly irrelevant sexual history, gender presentation, and role as a mother and wife to assess guilt and punishment