Question #1: Did the Federal District Court and United States Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, violate Article I, Article 4, Article VI, of the United States Constitution by enacting, applying, and givig 'effect' to a 'Judicial' law that negated and nullified United States statutory law legislated and passed by the United State Congress and signed into law by the President, with their ruling(s) making 'unreasonable application of United States Supreme Court law', and being 'contrary to other, long established United States Supreme Court law', as well as being in direct conflict with other 'circuit courts' precedent?

Question #2- Did the Federal District Court, N.D. Oklahoma, and the United States Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals violate Sells Right to 'Due Process' by enacting and applying a 'Judicial Law' [nullifying U.S. 'Statutory Law'] to re-characterize Sells' 'specific' motions, made under a 'specific' statute for 'specific' relief, into a motion under a 'general' statute for 'general' 'Habeas' relief, for the SOLE pin-pose of avoiding adjudication of Sells 'motions/claims' in which 'merit' was shown?

Did the Federal District Court and United States Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals violate the Constitution by enacting and applying a judicial law that negated and nullified U.S. statutory law?