1. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that Jonathan forfeited his argument about Detective
Dolan's and T.J.'s testimony about T.J.'s reaction to Jonathan's photo during a photo array.
Was the Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision an erroneous application of law?

2. The Wisconsin Court of Appeals held that Jonathan's constitutional right to have his
attorney present at a live lineup was violated. But this violation was harmless error. Was this
violation harmless error?

3. Should social science be considered during the harmless error analysis in witness
identification cases?

Was the Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision an erroneous application of law?