Billy J. Seabolt v. United States
Is n a Or fS cleanly '*)■hrf'ai Me. ic/fen J Ury a ciiS^feSSeJ SikuaH&s? cturfoty a i°iy fr'iCii) Cl/)of; fkey Conk fad lor fhemseineL iky anj Hof <y akkeynpk fo f/ce. kkeftO J iny 5f/??/Z&r 'Ik on <3 Ui on lAi7 J O-kcvra L$ / K? On1 7(^iSkr^SSeJ
X s / f a fair- fnYai Skynfiy l \ hand5 i-ku.es, kon 0.5 Joon os poSSiUt ■, Lokon Ike prosearh* jam deX&ftd&niy VY)ftk >njf Oi/orcharojCJ ike.7 de fend j Cmd fk e.n cdcdar tny fa nr 7VTiCnrO Ok a ry €} Y> hct- , Lyh<en (/1 o h/ Ohe on7 Tks l kiS i$ Hof lo.ks ku f Jp&ybo ff1 l-frlo f< preju d /clod ciffi lxjk& icoji "fh'(y\f( fkc'Aare* UJ\\ A eckr on Ik eJury ioiffi O tot o-P C horyej kkey) fkc defendeun f Ce rhaiwfy d'd SornrHOny •• Luwncy*aue Qy Le< (jjherc fkere fy $,noke y fkere rrjayf he f(fa.*
Is it a fair trial when the jury is clearly in a distressed situation during a long trial and they contradict themselves on finding guilty and not guilty on similar charges in an attempt to resolve the distressed situation as soon as possible?