1. Whether being in federal "detention, " "custody " is a substantial denial of
Ronald Freeman 's constitutional right of liberty, without "sufficient cause, " without
compelling reasons for the United States Congress to proscribe marijuana as a
dangerous substance, a drug crime, therefore without due process of law,
contravening Amendments IV aikd V of the Constitution of the United States.

2. Whether a party imprisoned under a sentence of a United States court, upon
conviction of a crime created by and indictable under an unconstitutional act of
Congress, should be discharged from imprisonment by this court on habeas corpus.

Whether being in federal detention, custody is a substantial denial of Ronald Freeman's constitutional right of liberty, without sufficient cause, without compelling reasons for the United States Congress to proscribe marijuana as a dangerous substance, a drug) crime, therefore without due process of law, contravening Amendments IV and V of the Constitution of the United States