No. 23-6539

In Re Jesse James Corbin-Bey

Lower Court: N/A
Docketed: 2024-01-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: 14th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-challenge due-process ex-post-facto extraordinary-relief federal-jurisdiction habeas-corpus imprisonment slavery state-court-jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

1.) Should this Court use the power to grant a Writ of Habeas Corpus to the Petitioner who has no other available forum to raise his Compelling claims of being unconstitutionally imprisoned on behalf of the Roanoke City Circuit Court Judge, who failed to properly and Precisely identify the Petitioner in "Propria Persona" and for having an Ex Post Facto label "Black" attached to the Petitioner's false Status through Ex Post Facto Laws and Labels legislated by U.S. Congress? By what Branch of Law authorized the United States to apply abolished Slave labels (Negroe, Black, and Colored) to any person of African descent after 1865) to reinstate such persons as Chattel property and reopen the institution of Slavery under colorable Constitutional Amendments?

2) Are "Blacks" "slaves" or otherwise "Persons", as used in the 14th Amendment and how can they be made 1st class Citizens without their inalienable Free, National descendant name of their Forefathers?

3) As "Blacks" with criminal records judged crime, can property produce, and or possibly commit which the owner, the "slave master" is not accountable for in the Court of Laws?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Should this Court use its power to grant a writ of habeas corpus to the Petitioner who has no other available forum to raise his compelling claims of being unconstitutionally imprisoned

Docket Entries

2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-01-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-18
Petition for writ of habeas corpus and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed.

Attorneys

Corbin-Bey, In Re Jesse J.
Jesse James Corbin-Bey — Petitioner