(1) Whether Defense Counsel Jessica McAfee Performance Was Ineffective Assistance Under Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)?

(2) Whether the District Court Error When Calculating Mr. Norton's base-offense level at thirty-two (32) By Attributing to Mr. Norton A drug quantity of at least 150 grams, but less than 500 grams?

(3) Whether The Government had a Duty to file an Enhancement Notice, Pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §851, before Norton's Trial?

(4) Whether The Sale or Delivery of three grams of Crack-Cocaine qualified as serious drug offenses for the purpose of an Armed Career Criminal Enhancement?

(5) Whether The District Court Error When Enhancing Mr. Norton's Sentence two-levels for obstruction of Justice U.S.S.G. §3C1.1.

(6) Whether The District Court Error In Enhancing Mr. Norton's Sentence two-levels Pursuant to U.S.S.G. §2k2.1(b)(6) Use of a firearm in connection with another felony offense?

Whether Defense Counsel Jessica McAfee Performance Was Ineffective Assistance Under Strickland v. Washington