No. 23-6511

Thomas Albert Sosnowski v. Ricky D. Dixon, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2024-01-18
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: child-protective-services constitutional-rights due-process exhaustion-requirement exigent-circumstances federal-court fourth-amendment habeas-corpus social-worker state-court warrantless-search
Latest Conference: 2024-03-01
Question Presented (from Petition)

Governing the Statutory Requirements that a Federal Court as Ms. copy Section 2r^S^£^jli9.^AC. properly exhaust in the highest Court of his State. Jalsj__U«S\ fonsf ftuffonq | _]?/ qkfe._vlojoifLon damns ikt Courts before toe FeJe/d Court s must rule^uport the merits etthose U.Si Constitu tional Rights ^i).LcL+/o^_.GLaL^era

How similar In iitTaa tcmh do q wrong -Pully _j^iLvldeZ^Sec-f/o^ 2rSt Fdtt'onerjs U< 5*._£e^fiiy.tiojQ_ai ..Rvg Uixs v/fo latum ci cn ms MQU/ ALSO PRESENTED me FeJerd^ Cov/rts Taqv/eto Be \A Comparis on) "to Ins (J*S» £ohsttuti #ona i Rijhts Violation ___ ; claims that were already properly exhausted in the___hfjhest Court &t his State, betore the ,Federa l___Courts must rule upon ^fne ^nerfts ot to is V*S> ___Cwstituttona I Rijkt s Violation cl of ms fn order To in compliance with Procedure I Due Process _ _Requiremen ts be

Is li...clear [y _ eszkidLshi yth_ Am endment Law that g warra ntless tbreej seizu re ota JT yea/_oil^J-lJ- _Children cmd Ft?milks ^DCF| jn vest water can tikfl V be .^usfilipL l^^^J^CF _ iLhvcsticfejd^r^^^float t'le do i la fs m serious aampr r>-P suffering severe _ _phy<>tca harm before a Utirrant Ceut oderj^If -j-Q

Is_lilide<2rlY-„e£+G^x _WiicraftL+1 j^-^jced- tnicy-i *vk ____.e^__py£+ed_ip^_e£L<j£ja^^ __r.hild ?yiSi4*> "me Pgxi 'hfoner^ts ho we ^_Jk_l+jcWdk_^+<ai?J_Ls_tLexi _die_i>WAT.Xe4W.j/Aoi4^ _RijMs by condueffng c\ uidmmile.ss forced en4ry frrh) his uj^iter. ..me _ _Aul HxcepmwJ.^ eorJj;.cfma^kQtMsjfj rtl cuvXilQ tfe by DETA IN 1M& mV) Juana SEED. Re_ wntilwL oU home ) 7@

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a wrongfully convicted Section 2254 petitioner's U.S. constitutional rights violation claims that were not previously exhausted in the state courts must be presented to the federal courts before they can rule on the merits

Docket Entries

2024-03-04
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
2024-02-09
Waiver of right of respondent Ricky Dixon to respond filed.
2023-09-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 20, 2024)

Attorneys

Ricky Dixon
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal , Respondent
Thomas Albert Sosnowski
Thomas Albert Sosnowski — Petitioner