No. 23-6503
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: circuit-split civil-rights criminal-procedure due-process free-speech fundamental-rights pretrial-claims prosecutorial-discretion prosecutorial-vindictiveness standing
Key Terms:
ERISA DueProcess Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
ERISA DueProcess Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2024-02-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
When a defendant presents strong circumstantial evidence of possible vindictiveness beyond mere correlation, can a presumption of vindictiveness arise pretrial?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a defendant presents strong circumstantial evidence of possible vindictiveness beyond mere correlation, can a presumption of vindictiveness arise pretrial?
Docket Entries
2024-02-20
Petition DENIED.
2024-02-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
2024-01-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2024-01-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due February 16, 2024)
Attorneys
David Rivera
Katie Hurrelbrink — Federal Defenders of San Diego, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent