Did this impermissible expansion of the scope of the federal child pornography statutes, in direct contravention of both the holdings of this Court and the plain language of the controlling statutes, deny Ms. Kolhoff her Due Process rights to a fair trial and the constitutional protections requiring criminal laws to explicitly and definitely identify what conduct is punishable?

Did the courts below impermissibly expand the scope of the federal child pornography statutes in contravention of this Court's precedents and the plain language of the statutes, thereby denying the petitioner her due process rights?