Where Defense Counsels and the Lower Court blatantly violate,
and ignore Federal Rule of Civil Procedures, Precepts, and Statutes in
handling Appellant 's case. 1st, where both parties took full advantage of
(Pro-Se) Appellant 's little knowledge of the law. From Defense party,
blatantly not providing Appellant 's request, for "production of documents"
in their possession (which was requested early in the process and in good
faith) but to no avail. 2nd, the Lower Court shunning/disregarding totally
"excluding " Appellant 's proffered exhibits/direct evidence in defense of
Appellant 's case, prohibiting its merits to be fairly judged. 3rd, in addition,
Lower Court "depriving "Appellant of his Constitutional/Amendment rights
under "due process of law", called "Due Process Violation " - is when
governmental actors violate and frustrate the fairness of proceedings, or
when a judge is biased against a party in a civil action. Appellant is asking
the question of whether the government 's "deprivation " (of due process) is/
was justified by a sufficient purpose?

Under what circumstances or process should a Pro-Se Appellant
"request " in order for him to be provided "Right to Due Process of Law? ",
"Right to a Fair, Impartial Jury Trial? ", thereby purging the taint from
depriving Appellant 's Constitutional Rights, that have been violated.

Whether the lower court and defense counsel violated federal rules of civil procedure, due process, and the appellant's constitutional rights